Employment Division v Smith, 479 US 872 (1990) Case Brief
Instructions
Case Brief with same instructions as last week.
Answer
U.S. Supreme CourtEmployment Div. v. Smith., 494 U.S. 872 (1990)Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. SmithNo. 88-1213Argued Nov. 6, 1989Decided Apr. 17, 1990494 U.S. 872Statement of FactTwo members of the Native American Church had been fired by a private drug rehabilitation clinic for having consumed peyote, a sacramental drug. Alfred Smith and Galen Black maintained that using peyote for religious purposes was an integral part of the Native American Church. They then proceeded to seek unemployment benefits in vain. The employment division filed a lawsuit maintaining that Smith and Black, who got fired due to 'misconduct' in their workplaces, were not eligible for unemployment benefits. Any person who is released from their jobs on job-related misconduct is not...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer
Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
- Unlimited Revisions
- Free 24/7 Support and chat
- Money back guaranteed
- Low prices with discounts
- Experienced writers.
- Free Unlimited support