Labeling
Instructions
We may refer to a person who suffers from autism as "autistic", and we say that such a person is autistic rather than that they "have autism". Labeling in this manner defines the person by his or her disorder, and may be seen as suggesting that the disorder is the most salient, defining aspect of the person. Should we continue to use this language?Are there benefits to using a classification system in which we use labels, or diagnoses?Please respond to the above in a few paragraphs.not required to cite outside sources
Answer
Should we continue to use the labeling language?No. Whenever individuals are diagnosed with a mental illness, they are given a label depending on the mental disorder they have. However, labeling strips them off their old identity and gives them a new one. People in the society start viewing the patient as being mental ill rather than having a mental illness. The labels then result in development of stereotypes, which in turn promote patient stigmatization. Therefore, labelling hinders self-acceptance of mentally ill patients affecting their health-seeking behavior. Some patients might be afraid to share their experiences with their physicians, family, or friends for fear of being given another label. Therefore, a better language should be developed to protect mentally ill persons from the...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer
Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
- Unlimited Revisions
- Free 24/7 Support and chat
- Money back guaranteed
- Low prices with discounts
- Experienced writers.
- Free Unlimited support