retribute vs restore justice
Instructions
For each question, your initial discussion post must be a minimum of 200 words. Your response must also include a minimum of two (2) specific references to course readings and the corresponding APA formatted reference entry(s). You may also include references to outside readings as well as personal observations. viewing the YouTube video, Retributive Justice vs. Restorative Justice: Pursuing Justice and Peace Concurrently explain why the authors assert punishment alone is insufficient to restore justice. In your own words, explain the three conceptions used to define restorative justice. Discuss which is most aligned with Van Ness and Strong's definition and how they relate to the three principles of restorative justice.
Answer
Retribute vs. restore justiceGenerally, justice systems aim at punishing offenders in relation to the crimes they have committed. Retributive justice was one of the approaches that was exploited in justice delivery. However, Zachary Kaufman, who was concentrating on the Rwandan genocide, pointed out that retributive justice would be suitable (Emory School of Law, 2013). A number of reasons have been cited to back this claim. For instance, under retributive justice, Rwanda was in line to execute more than one million people, who participated in the killings. Also, the retributive justice was overcrowding the Rwandan jails meaning they were not participating in economic development. The worst of retributive justice is that the perpetrators after serving their jail terms were back in the soci...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer
Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
- Unlimited Revisions
- Free 24/7 Support and chat
- Money back guaranteed
- Low prices with discounts
- Experienced writers.
- Free Unlimited support