Business Law
Instructions
Dozier and his wife, daughter, and grandson lived in the house Dozier owned. At the request of the daughter and grandson, Paschall made some improvements to the house. Dozier did not authorize the improvements, but he knew that the improvements were being made and did not object to them. Paschall sued Dozier for the reasonable value of the improvements. Dozier argued that he had not made any contract for such improvements. Was he obligated to pay for such improvements?
Answer
Business LawAnyone is obligated to pay for all services that have been provided to them. However, all services should have a contract for them to be legal and valid. Some people take the advantage of not paying workers and for services if the work did not have an agreement or written contract. In this case, one will need legal help to acquire the money they were owed for the work they did.In the case of Paschall and Dozier, Dozier is obligated to pay Paschall for doing improvements on his house. Paschall has to make a formal complaint by filing a lawsuit and seek a judgment in court. The plaintiff will nevertheless have to hire a good lawyer who will represent him in a court of law (Clarkson & Miller, 2020). Dozier is the owner of the house but the plaintiff made the house improvement...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer
Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
- Unlimited Revisions
- Free 24/7 Support and chat
- Money back guaranteed
- Low prices with discounts
- Experienced writers.
- Free Unlimited support