5.1: Case Analysis
Instructions
Read Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry, 754 N.E. 2d 958 (Ind. App. 2001) Post your answers to questions 1 through 4 found at the end of the case. Do you agree with this decision? Support your answer with additional cases or research.
Answer
Dietz versus FinlayDietz filed a case against the Finlay firm after she was detained and accused of shoplifting, being a substance addict, and intending to deprive the firm of its value. This had happened after Dietz had offered an authorized discount to a client who had purchased a diamond ring. As a result, Dietz was taken to an interrogation room and interviewed in the presence of a female manager while being monitored by a female security officer. Dietz filed a case on the claims of false imprisonment, defamation, invasion of privacy, and infliction of emotional distress. After listening to the provided claims, the court granted summary judgment on the infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy claims. On the other hand, the court allowed the claims on defamation and fals...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer
Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
- Unlimited Revisions
- Free 24/7 Support and chat
- Money back guaranteed
- Low prices with discounts
- Experienced writers.
- Free Unlimited support