LP4 Assignment: Fact Pattern

Instructions

LP4 Assignment: Fact PatternThis assignment will assess Competency 4: Explore legal issues surrounding employee pay, benefits, and terms/conditions of employment.Directions: Read the case Vahar v. Cole National Group, 251 Fed.Appx. 993 (6th Cir. 2007) found in Chapter 12, pages 449-452 in your textbook. Write a paper, incorporating answers to Case Questions 1 through 4 found at the end of the case summary. Your written work should include discussion of the situation, responses to the Case Questions, and any other questions that your instructor sends. Include your description of how the situation should have been handled. Explain the courts decision in the case.  Do you agree? Support your position with additional research and analysis. Write your responses using correct grammar, APA citations, and analysis of the situation. As a guide, your paper should include 700-1000 words of content. Your title page, Certificate of Authorship and references do not count towards your word content. Do not rewrite the fact pattern in the case, just highlight any facts you determine are significant and impact your discussions (this should only be a paragraph). You will be graded on your analysis of the situation and how well you support your analysis with both the laws and the facts. Your analysis should be at a high level, meeting all content required in the assignment presented. All work should be completed following APA guidelines contained in the Publications Manual, 6th edition. Please ensure that your work is properly cited. A failure to properly cite sources may result in a grade reduction or a grade of zero.

Answer

Fact PatternIt is vital for human resource managers and other administrative personnel to consider all the factors revolving around the establishment of a salary and avoiding any form of discrimination, especially based on gender. In this particular scenario, the plaintiff had complained against her former employer that the employer had discriminated her in terms of salary based on her gender. Vehar kept on receiving salary lower than her male counterparts and received an appropriate salary once she left the firm. On filing a petition, her case was granted summary judgment in favor of her employer, a step that made her appeal. When the case was listened to by the court of appeal, the case was approved for proceedings. The legal issue involved was gender discrimination in the determination...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Free 24/7 Support and chat
  • Money back guaranteed
  • Low prices with discounts
  • Experienced writers.
  • Free Unlimited support

Hear from our customers

Get a quote Chat with support Find an expert Frequently asked questions