Discuss the articles, topics, similarities and differences.

Instructions

Hankla, Charles and Daniel Kuthy.  2012.  Economic Liberalism in Illiberal Regimes: Authoritarian Variation and the Political Economy of Trade. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 492-504.McGillivray, Fiona.  1997.  Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs.  American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 584-607. Kono, Daniel Y.  2006.  Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency.  American Political Science Review 100 (3): 353-368.Kim, In Song, John Longregan, and Marc Ratkovic.  2019.  The Effects of Political Institutions on the Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade.  International Organization 73 (4): 755-792.

Answer

Political Institutions and Trade OutcomesOver the years, an extensive literature has come up delving into the connection between political institutions that are democratic and the outcomes of trade policies. The authoritarian regime that is in place can influence the political economy of trade. More often than not, institutionalized authorities embrace more open trade policies (Hankla et al. np). Arguably, according to Hankla, institutions based on autocracy should have a more significant inducement to bestow goods that are public as opposed to individual products. Consequently, you expect that a multiparty will choose open trades rather than non-party authoritarians, monarchies, and military factions. Additionally, more solid dictatorships possess time horizons that are relatively longer....

To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Free 24/7 Support and chat
  • Money back guaranteed
  • Low prices with discounts
  • Experienced writers.
  • Free Unlimited support

Hear from our customers

Get a quote Chat with support Find an expert Frequently asked questions