Week 4 Discussion

Instructions

Week 4 DiscussionPrint PageApplying Theoretical FrameworksYou have distinguished theoretical from conceptual frameworks, and both types of frameworks from models. Also, you have learned the value and importance of identifying a relevant theoretical framework for your proposed research. In other readings this week, you read about a number of theoretical frameworks that are pertinent in public policy and administration. In this Discussion, you will identify two theoretical frameworks you might use in your research, at least one of which will become a section in your Prospectus.By Day 3, post a brief description of your Dissertation topic and problem statement. Select one theoretical framework either the Shafritz and Weible & Sabatier texts; write 23 paragraphs on your selected theory and be sure to:Describe the framework and the relevance of that theory to your dissertation topic and problem statement.Why did you select the theory as being most appropriate for framing your proposed research? Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.Read a selection of your colleagues' postings.Respond by Day 6 to at least of at least two of your colleagues who have not yet had a reply, in any of the following ways:Support or challenge your colleagues reasoning for their selection of theoretical frameworks. How appropriate are they for both their Dissertation topic and problem statement, and for the field of public policy and administration?If possible, offer another theoretical framework that might be equally or more suitable in public policy and administration.Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.

Answer

The Advocacy Coalition TheoryIt was established by Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1988,1993). The Advocacy Coalition theory concentrates on relations of advocacy coalitions where each comprises of players from diverse institutions who share a series of policy opinions within a policy subsystem. Policy alteration is a function of external proceedings of the subsystem and internal competition in the subsystem. The theory takes much time plotting the belief systems of policy leaders and assessing the circumstances where learning is policy-driven across coalitions can transpire. It has triggered substantial attention among nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as well as constructive criticism (Schlager 1995). This theory seeks to avail a clear comprehension...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Free 24/7 Support and chat
  • Money back guaranteed
  • Low prices with discounts
  • Experienced writers.
  • Free Unlimited support

Hear from our customers

Get a quote Chat with support Find an expert Frequently asked questions