When presenting a plan for change in the workplace, you must first identify and substantiate a problem, which you accomplished in Weeks 1 & 2. Once you have identified a problem and substantiated the problem by analyzing peer-reviewed literature, you shou

Instructions

1. First Revised Week 2 Paper ( Attached)2. Create analytical framework  ( Attached)3. Use Template (Attached)When presenting a plan for change in the workplace, you must first identify and substantiate a problem, which you accomplished in Weeks 1 & 2. Once you have identified a problem and substantiated the problem by analyzing peer-reviewed literature, you should address biases and/or counter arguments about the problem in your professional field or discipline.  This week, you will incorporate the practice piece of the SPL Model and add to your discussion by analyzing and evaluating additional peer-reviewed literature to address contradictions in the literature. Locate a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed articles (in addition to those you found in Week 2) in your professional field or discipline (that is, professional journal articles, not scholarly journal articles) that focuses on the problem you identified in Week 1. Be sure to find articles published within the last 5 years. Analyze and evaluate the articles by adding them to the analytical framework you created in Week 2, noting different authors perspectives. Analyzing and evaluating authors differing perspectives, also called arguments, will provide you with a better understanding of the topic to advance your own points of view and advance your scholarly voice.  *** For information on building a scholarly argument, visit Doctoral Writing Resources and review the information under Argument Construction.Revise the pieces Weeks 1 and 2 assignments based on your instructors feedback.Write 1-2-pages discussing the similarities and differences among the authors perspectives on your identified problem. You may find it helpful to identify in the readings 2 main topics about the stated problem and use those topics in your analytical framework and as subheadings in your paper.  Write using scholarly voice. Insert the discussion in the Executive Summary Template where appropriate.Place your analytical framework as an Appendix to your paper. Submit this assignment along with your revised Week 1 and Week 2 submissions, using the Executive Summary template. You must integrate faculty feedback from the previous assignment into this assignment submission.Resources        CDS Central > Student Resources > Writing Resources         Grammar and Writing GuidesCopyright 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.Use this space to build your submission.You can add text, images, and files.Add ContentDetails & Information

Answer

Executive SummaryIdentified Problem Notably, failure to embrace self-identity is an intricate problem that describes the feeling about oneself. Self-identity can, however, be measured using both implicit and explicit measures. The problem affects student's performance and can lead to mental challenges and depression (McLeod, Horwood, & Fergusson, 2016). People with poor sense of self-identity tend to be dependent on others. The probability of being influenced by others is also high. In situations people with low sense of identities react more strongly and become personal. The individuals are hurt more by the feeling, and lose their sense of accomplishment. Those affected experience a challenge in living up to other people's expectations of them or even to their expectations. Consequent...

To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Free 24/7 Support and chat
  • Money back guaranteed
  • Low prices with discounts
  • Experienced writers.
  • Free Unlimited support

Hear from our customers

Get a quote Chat with support Find an expert Frequently asked questions