Does a posteriori reasoning provide a sufficient foundation for religion?

Instructions

Before You Begin: FOLLOW DIRECTIONS CAREFULLY AND EXACTLY, DO NOT WANT A OUTLINE. BUT A FINISHED PROJECT WITH INTRODUCTION, BODY PARAGRAPHS, AND CONCLUSION.1. Read (and re-read) Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Only use this as your one source: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4583/4583-h/4583-h.htm2. Think carefully about your approach to each part of the essay.3. Prepare an essay plan or outline.Expectations and Grading Rubric:Your essay will be graded according to the five categories below (each category is worth ten points):1. Personal Position:a. Thesis: does a posteriori reasoning provide a sufficient foundation for religion?i. Hint: consider the question carefully! Be certain you correctly understand a posteriori. Think carefully about what sufficient foundation for religion means.b. Argument: explain the reasons for your thesis.2. Character Positions:a. Theses: What are the positions of Philo, Cleanthes, and Demea with respect to the same question?b. Arguments: Why do they hold their respective positions?i. Hint: explain, in detail, any relevant arguments (e.g., the design argument).3. Critical Reflection:a. Critically evaluate your position using the characters from Humes Dialogues.b. Explain how your understanding of Humes Dialogues has influenced your position regarding this topic.4. Textual Support and Vocabulary:a. Justify your assertions regarding the positions of Philo, Cleanthes, and Demea with relevant quotations from the text.b. Where appropriate, correctly use (and, if necessary, explain) relevant vocabulary (e.g., skepticism, a posteriori, etc.).5. Composition:a. word count (1,250-1,750 words; include at end of essay)b. proper citations and Works Cited pagec. organization (introduction, with thesis statement; proper paragraphs; conclusion)d. spellinge. grammarGeneral Writing Tips: A first-rate philosophy essay is, above all, clear. Avoid broad, vague, unsubstantiated claims. Stick to the topic. Do not write a book report. When using quotations, keep them brief. They should supplement and support your argument, not provide a substitute for it. Introduce them and explain their relevance

Answer

Does a posteriori reasoning provide a sufficient foundation for religion?IntroductionNatural religion is a concept that links the aspect of God, spirits, and other objects such as the soul to the natural world. As such, it is applied in philosophy when it comes to defining religious aspects that are recognizable through reason and logic. Many experts and authors have provided their discussions about natural religion as the foundation for religions such as Judaism, Islam as well as Christianity. One of the perceptions explored in depth is posteriori reasoning. In this case, this paper will allude to the positions of philosophers such as Demea, Cleanthes and Philo in addressing whether posteriori reasoning provides sufficient foundation for religion.Personal positionFrom my perspective, it i...

To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Free 24/7 Support and chat
  • Money back guaranteed
  • Low prices with discounts
  • Experienced writers.
  • Free Unlimited support

Hear from our customers

Get a quote Chat with support Find an expert Frequently asked questions