PSY6030 PERSONALITY PAPER 1

Instructions

Write an APA style scholarly 5-7 page (plus additional title and reference pages) paper.Discuss the history and critique the arguments of the personality-situation debate.  What are the arguments and some of the research supporting them? What are your thoughts? What is meant by 'interactionism?' Please create two examples to illustrate the personalityXsituation interaction. What is the essential trait approach? Compare and contrast it to the typological approach. Pay attention to the research supporting both approaches. The Big Five is currently the dominant paradigm in the trait approach to personality.  Why do you think this is?  Based on your reading, research, and experience, what is your opinion of the Big Five? Be sure to support your arguments and writing with references to the academic literature.  You should at least include Funder chapters 4, 6, and the articles in the Donnelan, Lucas, & Fleeson (2009) special issue.  Feel free to bring in additional academic sources. You may find it helpful to review the grading rubric before beginning your paper. RubricPersonality Paper 1 Personality Paper 1 CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion Paper is 5-7 pages long plus an additional title and reference page.2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonality-Situation Debate A brief history of the personality-situation debate is provided. Arguments for both sides with supporting references to the literature and research are given. A coherent and well supported critique is given.8.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractionism Interactionism is accurately described and properly illustrated with two examples created by the student.4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEssential vs. Typological Trait Approach The essential trait approach is described and compared and contrasted to the typological trait approach. Attention is paid to the research relevant to both approaches.6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Big Five An analysis is given to explain the dominance of the Big Five approach. This is followed by a well supported critique of the Big Five.7.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA citations The paper is well supported in text and at the bottom in APA format. At least Funder chapters 4, 6, and articles from the Donnellan, Lucas, & Fleeson (2009) special issue are well incorporated.3.0 ptsREFRENCES MUST BE CITEDED AND USED FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT     TextsFunder, D. (2016). The personality puzzle (7th ed.). New York, NY: Norton & Company. *Prices vary. Discount pricing and used copies may be found at http://amazon.com, http://abe.com, http://powells.com, http://biblio.com, or other sites. Additionally, you may find that book search and price comparison tools, like http://addall.com or http://bookfinder.com, can be helpful. Please consider the timeliness of the delivery when selecting a purchase price and mode of shipping.        ReadingsBalcetis, E., Dunning, D., & Miller, R. L. (2008). Do collectivists know themselves better than individualists? Cross-cultural studies of the holier-than-thou phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 12521267. Barlow, D. H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Carl, J. R., Bullis, J. R., & Ellard, K. K. (2014). The nature,         diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism: Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science,        2(3), 344365.Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2005). The pursuit of meaningfulness in life. In C. R. Snyder,         & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 608618). New York: Oxford      University Press. Benet-Martnez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 492516. Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: 'Having' and 'doing' in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45(6), 735-750.Carlson, E. N. (2013). Overcoming the barriers to self-knowledge: Mindfulness as a path to seeing yourself as you really are. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 173186. Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203213. Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E., & Fleeson, W. (Eds.). (2009). Personality and assessment at age 40: Reflections on the past person-situation debate and emerging directions of future person-situation integration [Special issue]. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 117-290.Durbin, C. E., & Klein, D. N. (2006). Ten-year stability of personality disorders among outpatients with mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(1), 7584.Dweck, C. (1996). Capturing the dynamic nature of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(3), 348-362.  (Available as a PDF in the Canvas shell covered under our copyright license) Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L. (2014). Personality, well-being, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 719742. Gosling, S. (2008). Personality in non-human animals. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 2(2), 9851001. Haritatos, J., & Benet-Martnez, V. (2002). Bicultural identities: The interface of cultural, personality, and socio-cognitive processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 598606. (Available as a PDF in the Canvas shell covered under our copyright license) Hong, R. Y., & Paunonen, S. V. (2011). Personality vulnerabilities to psychopathology: Relations between trait structure and affective-cognitive processes. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 527562. Robinson, M. D., & Gordon, K. H. (2011). Personality dynamics: Insights from the personality social cognitive literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(2), 161-176.Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of consulting psychology, 21(2), 95-103.Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as     developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a    science (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). New York: McGraw-Hill. (link for full text download provided in the Canvas shell)Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture,      personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal    of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 582-593.Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment theory and research: Resurrection of the psychodynamic approach to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(1), 2245. (Available as a PDF in the Canvas shell covered under our copyright license) Sutin, Angelina R.; Costa, Jr., Paul T.; Wethington, Elaine; Eaton, William. (2010). Turning Points and Lessons Learned: Stressful Life Events and Personality Trait Development Across Middle Adulthood. Psychology & Aging, 25(3), 524-533.Wirtz, D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Perspectives on the self in the East and the West: Searching for the quiet ego. In H. A. Wayment, J. J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 149-158).In addition to the assigned readings, students are asked to incorporate additional scholarly articles of their own choosing in their paper assignments.   

Answer