Assignment 2.2

Instructions

Assignment 2.2- Click to submit Assignment2.2 Written Assignment: Case Briefs or Discussions (50 points): From the following case list (each one is discussed in your text) select (3) three cases which you feel are essential to an understanding of the evolution of Fourth Amendment legal interpretation and provide a one page legal brief for each case. Additionally, discuss the importance of these cases and their contemporary relevance to the state of searches, warrants and arrests today.Choose from the following list of cases:Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S, 89 (1964)Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987)Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980)Miller v. United States, 357 U.S. 301 (1958)Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)Chimel v. California,  395 U.S. 752 (1969)Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364 (1964)Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967)Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990)Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)****Four elements that are essential to any useful brief are the following:(a) Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment)(b) Issues (what is in dispute)(c) Holding (the applied rule of law)(d) Rationale (reasons for the holding)

Answer

Assignment 2.2IntroductionThe Fourth Amendment seeks to protect people against the unwarranted entry to their premises as well as ensuring they are not seized without proper justification and documentation by authorities. Various cases have been essential in helping to attain a proper perception of the Fourth Amendment. This narrative seeks to analyze three cases in relation to the evolution of the Fourth Amendment.Katz v. USFacts The petitioner was overheard by the FBI who had tapped a telephone transmitting providing information to other parties. Authorities had attached an eavesdropping device on the other end of the line (Vitiello, 2017). Thus, they were able to overhear the information provided by the petitioner.Issues The issue of dispute is that the FBI had contravened the Fourth Am...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Free 24/7 Support and chat
  • Money back guaranteed
  • Low prices with discounts
  • Experienced writers.
  • Free Unlimited support

Hear from our customers

Get a quote Chat with support Find an expert Frequently asked questions