indefinite detention
Instructions
Discussion BoardStart a discussion thread that answers the following:1 page The Jennings v. Rodriguez decision is pretty interesting. Clearly, throughout the U.S. Code there are components of the law that allow indefinite detention of those whose status (legal or illegal) is in question. Yet, the reality at some POEs differs from the rule of law.As this course is part of the National Security Administration Masters, and you should have some basic comprehension of International Relations and Political Science, how do you see the issue? Remember, an opinion without references is bloviating.
Answer
Indefinite detentionThe case pitting Rodriguez against Jennings was significant in the sense that it touched on the sensitive issue of immigrants. As such, the court ruling by the court established that the immigrants could be detained and that they would not be granted statutory rights to bond hearings (Torrey 2017). Alex Rodriguez was detained in 2004 on the grounds that the Attorney General had issued a warrant that immigrants could be detained as their case was being decided (Johnson 2017). Subsequently, that decision was challenged with the justification that immigrants had the right to bond hearings and the freedom from prolonged detention. Despite the Court of Appeal ruling in favor, the Supreme Court overturned the decision through a plurality opinion. In regard to the basics of In...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer
Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
- Unlimited Revisions
- Free 24/7 Support and chat
- Money back guaranteed
- Low prices with discounts
- Experienced writers.
- Free Unlimited support