Essay 600-1000 words

Instructions

TWO texts: Gutner (textbook), Ch5: World Bank and Winters and Gould, WB Accountability (see attachments)Part 1: Read the TWO texts carefully. Identify the core argument / conclusion for each text and some supporting ideas/facts used to back it up. What do you find most important/interesting?Part 2: Compare the two arguments/ideas you identified in the two readings. How similar/different are they? Conclude with your own take on the topic. What is your take-away? (avoid unsubstantiated statements like I agree with the author etc., if you do, say why).Structure your paper in four parts:1) first summary: what does the author set out to do? What is main conclusion?2) second summary: what does the author set out to do? What is main conclusion?3) comparative analysis: identify common and unique elements4) conclusion: synthesize your own conclusion. What do you take away from reading these two texts? What issue emerge as critical in your view? What questions do you have?Length: 600 to 1000 words. The two summaries will likely take most space, section 3 & 4 could possibly be collapsed into one segment.Use word count, not page count! Note word count on top of page.Save paper: single space, print on both sides of the paper!Grading: You will be graded on- your ability to succinctly identify key issues addressed by the authors,- your ability to bring out common themes and differences in your final analysis- organization and writing

Answer

Amount of Words: 939 WordsArticle SummarySummaryThe article Betting on Oil: The World Banks Attempt to Promote Accountability in Chad by Matthew S. Winters and John A. Gould illustrates how countries rich in resources particularly Chad continually fail to develop due to poor governance. In essence, the World Bank tries to use the influence and position as one of the leading foreign aids to writing up regulations that would ensure there is an oversight panel to ensure that government does not misuse the Chadian oil resources. However, the prominent persons in the government including the president are the ones on the front line to conduct side dealings that go against the World Banks regulations on what should be done and what should not be done when it comes to the resources.The main concl...
To avoid plagiarism, part of the answer is hidden. Click on the button below to order the full answer.
Order Answer Back
Price Calculator
Manage orders
Why we are Ranked the best
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Free 24/7 Support and chat
  • Money back guaranteed
  • Low prices with discounts
  • Experienced writers.
  • Free Unlimited support

Hear from our customers

Get a quote Chat with support Find an expert Frequently asked questions