Using Borsas text, show how treating Kahlo as a tragic artist decontextualizes or depoliticizes Kahlos work. It is a second year philosophy of art class.

Instructions

GoalThe goal of this assignment is to propose a thesis (an interpretation or argument) on a given topic in philosophy of art and provide an argumentative defense of this thesis. You will be evaluated according to the following checklist.General        The formatting of the essay meets the guidelines posted online.        The Bibliography contains full bibliographical information for all sources cited in the essay.        The final essay is 2000 words.        My essay avoids the clichs parodied by A Generic College Paper:(https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/a-generic-college-paper)Introduction        The Introduction includes a desrption of the philosophical problem under consideration.        The Introduction contains a clear thesis statement that is the focus of the essay.        The Introduction outlines and anticipates the claims or arguments that will be used to defend the thesis in the body of the essay.        The Introduction is no longer than a paragraph.Body         The Body contains arguments that provide reasons and evidence to support your thesis.        Each paragraph contributes to defending the thesis.        There is a clear order or organization to the argumenteach paragraph leads to the next. Digressions are omitted or relegated to footnotes.        If technical vocabulary is used, its use is defined.        I explicitly provide evidence from my primary source(s). Primary sources are here considered as the required readings.        In-text citations are included for all sources, primary and secondary, which include page numbers not just for quotes but for paraphrasing as well.        The argument anticipates possible objections.Conclusion         The Conclusion restates the thesis.        The Conclusion contains a summary of key arguments that defend the thesis.        The Conclusion summarizes how these arguments relate to or defend the thesis.Relevant Secondary LiteratureAs it states in the syllabus, a successful paper (receiving a mark of 85% or higher) will be able to incorporate material from at least one relevant peer-reviewed secondary source about the required readings in the course.     This means that the most that a paper can receive without consulting secondary literature is 85%, but this does not mean that a paper that consults secondary literature is guaranteed at least that mark.     In what follows, I will explain what I mean by relevant secondary literature or relevant secondary source.        A relevant source is a peer-reviewed article published in a scholarly journal, or a book (or chapter thereof) published by a scholarly press or gallery or museum.        This relevant source will propose a thesis and defend itthat is, it will attempt to persuade the reader to agree with the thesis.        In a relevant work, the author also often begins by assessing previous writings on the topic and develops or relates their thesis in relation to previous writings (or, in some cases, explains why nobody has properly addressed the topic).        Most importantly, this work is specifically related to topics in the required readings assigned in the course.Using Secondary Literature: Checklist        In the Body, the paper should explicitly engage with secondary literature; that is, I either use claims made by another author as evidence for my argument or build my argument by critiquing the claims of another author.         First, I introduce the over contribution or thesis of the relevant source: what its about.        Then I explain the particular feature of the relevant source that bears on (is important or relevant to) my discussion.        Then I account for or evaluate the contribution of the relevant source. That is, I explain how the relevant source relates to my argument. Things to consider: does it confirm or support my argument? Do I need to supply an argument so that the reader accepts my view rather than the author?Writing About Art        When I discuss a work of art, my first reference includes Artist last name/preferred name, Title (date), as in Manet, Luncheon on the Grass (1863).        This artwork is reproduced in an appendix to the essay, which is placed after the bibliography.        There is some discussion of both: 1) the general significance of the work; and 2) the relation of detail under discussion to the broader whole.        Broader whole can refer to: 1) the relationship between part and whole of a work; 2) the broader argument; 3) the relationship between two works.        Discussions of artwork should always be referenced back to whatever philosophical or critical question is at hand.Its a second year philosophy of art class.I need a peer reviewed secondary source relating to this article below. Based on this article: Joan Borsa, Frida Kahlo: Marginalization and the Critical Female Subject, in Feminism-Art-Theory. Ed. Hilary Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 257273.

Answer